I'd like to talk about a little experience I had recently. Having changed health insurance carriers, I was instructed to have an establishing appointment with my primary care physician which primarily included an interview and a "physical." I was actually quite excited to see what the primary care physician's physical examination had evolved into since it had been literally YEARS since I had received a "complete physical." Much to my disappointment, the most physical thing I had to do was lay down and sit up on the examination table for abdominal palpation. Auscultation occurred, visual observation of my skin, blood pressure and temperature was taken.... however, no range of motion testing, no manual muscle testing, no gait analysis, no assessment of functional movement... all this despite an industry branding of a "complete physical." As if the results of this physical was a complete analysis of one's health, inferring the promise or at least projection of longevity, good health, and absence of disease should the "physical" return normal values.
It became more of a let down when I was told that the industry movement was towards proactive healthcare through means of exercise, clean eating, and a general sense of healthy living. But, how could such a physical evaluate a patient's needs, abilities, impairments, and risk factors in regards to exercise and healthy living?
It became more of a let down when I was told that the industry movement was towards proactive healthcare through means of exercise, clean eating, and a general sense of healthy living. But, how could such a physical evaluate a patient's needs, abilities, impairments, and risk factors in regards to exercise and healthy living?
In any case, while I was supremely happy with my physician, I was a little bummed out as a consumer. There was nothing truly physical about the "physical" I just had. The most valuable information I would eventually walk away with was going to be my lab values -- however, there really isn't much compelling evidence that the labs would determine, predict, or even be successfully utilized to prevent health, injury, or illness.
My impression is that this physical is a little formality performed because physician physicals have always been done this way. In my humble opinion, anything that has always been done a certain way without justification, standing up to academic challenge, or refined from the crucible of competition requires severe revisitation.
After a few tweets venting my professional frustration based on my position taken here:
- Future Thoughts for Private Practice Physical Therapy (2014) - Expressing the case for a tier one musculoskeletal healthcare provider embodied by a primary care physical therapist
- And expanded here: The Case for the Primary Care Physiotherapist.
I received some social response. And, finally, this tweet came about:
@PittPT Planning a blog on this!
— Dr. Ben Fung (@DrBenFung) January 19, 2015
And, it lead to this collaborative post to which I'm very proud to say is the first post on this blog with guest authorship!
Taking it away for the rest of this blog (with my most sincere thanks and appreciation for his thoughts) will be Chris Bise representing Pitt Physical Therapy on how they are training, preparing, and empowering the physical therapists today for the strategic environment of tomorrow!
Taking it away for the rest of this blog (with my most sincere thanks and appreciation for his thoughts) will be Chris Bise representing Pitt Physical Therapy on how they are training, preparing, and empowering the physical therapists today for the strategic environment of tomorrow!
The Physical Therapist of Tomorrow
It’s
been a few weeks since @PittPT and myself engaged in this conversation. Since
that time, CSM and a number of Twitter engagements have only reinforced my
thought that the time for the “Musculoskeletal Primary Care Professional” is
now. In my opinion, this goal is mission critical for the health of the
profession.
The
experience that Ben had with his PCP, unfortunately, is not isolated. Countless
patients and professionals relate stories of doctor / patient interaction that
consisted of little or no “physical” interaction. The physical examination has
been swapped for diagnostic studies. Even physicians recognize the loss of the physical
exam is concerning.
Dr. Lisa Sanders
(House MD consultant and NYT author)
is quoted as saying “The physical exam will die completely or it will be
resuscitated.”
Our
vision and mission here at the University of Pittsburgh is the education of the
modern physical therapist. The mantra here starts with “practice at the top of
your license” and ends with “don’t send me patients, let me manage them.” Those
two statements encompass what we feel are the essential elements of physical
therapy practice. Let’s start with the first:
“Practice at the top
of your license.”
This
has long been the vision of many of the leaders here at the University of
Pittsburgh. Our curriculum is designed around the independent musculoskeletal
practitioner, operating without a referral (unrestricted direct access),
managing the full range of musculoskeletal conditions. Thus, mastery of the
physical exam is the first step in the journey to become a musculoskeletal
expert. With this mastery comes an expectation that the knowledge gained will
be applied. Many students in their transition to “new grad” are subjected to
environments where they are expected to work under the supervision of a
physician or have a diagnosis handed to them. The physical exam, or at least
the screening elements, begin to fall to the side and become skills lost to
those physical therapists. Practice patterns change, and in some cases critical
thinking declines. At this point many will rationalize this decline with “I
don’t have direct access in my practice environment.” I would posit that direct
access, though a tangible element of outpatient practice, is in every practice
environment available to the physical therapist. At CSM this year Karen Litzy, Dr.Kyle Ridgeway & Ann Wendel participated in a panel on this subject. They
proposed that physical therapists practice with a “direct access
mindset”
across the entire range of practice environments. Some may see this as
broadening our scope of practice. This isn’t an increase in our scope; rather, it
is a call to assume ownership of the title “musculoskeletal expert.” Direct
access isn’t an issue for only the outpatient therapist, but for the profession
as a whole if we are to evolve from technicians to managers. We are
musculoskeletal experts and physicians, nurses and other medical professionals
know too look for the closest physical therapist when they need help.
“Don’t send me
patients, let me manage them”
The
role of the therapist has long been one of dependence on the physician for
referrals and thus for employment. This arrangement clearly undervalues the
education of the physical therapist, but as a profession, we’ve accepted this
as the status quo. As physician sponsored studies here, here, and here recognize that PCPs are undereducated
when it comes to musculoskeletal medicine, the proposed solution has been more
physician education, and/or extender (PA/NP) specialization. Instead of
increasing the burden on the physician or providing additional education to
extenders I’d propose that there is a ready, well educated, musculoskeletal
expert ready to fill this role. Enter the modern physical therapist.
The
modern physical therapist no longer simply treats patients, he/she manages
them. The modern physical therapist is part of the diagnostic team, taking the
lead on all musculoskeletal problems or impairments. This occurs “across the practice
continuum”
and lets the therapist lead when it comes to access, diagnosis, dose,
frequency, intervention. But we need to embrace different practice environments
and see the physical therapist as a portal of entry into the healthcare system.
Our relationships with physicians (and other therapists for that matter) needs
to become lateral rather than up and down. In a perfect world, we would
actually increase referrals to physicians for non-musculoskeletal problems. We
know early access to Physical Therapy (here, here) reduces cost and utilization, and
that physical therapists are effective differential diagnosticians
for musculoskeletal conditions.
With this knowledge, the next practice environment should be the office of the
PCP.
My
vision for the future of physical therapy involves the earliest possible access
to PT. You call your PCP and tell them you have knee pain, back pain (insert
musculoskeletal complaint here). Your first stop after the waiting room is the
PT who makes sure you’re appropriate for treatment and either treats you that
day, gives you an HEP and schedules a follow-up. With conditions that require
extended care, the patient is referred to the appropriate PT provider. I can
hear the critics already complaining about follow up and visits, but I can play
the same game. Seriously, when was the last time your ankle sprain needed more
than 1 visit and a follow-up to make sure he’s progressing? This would require
a significant paradigm shift for some, but gone would be the days of
inappropriate referrals. Now, in regards to musculoskeletal conditions, the PT
is responsible for getting the right provider, in the right place, at the right
time.
We
can’t continue to subsist on the beneficence of physicians, and I’m pretty sure
this isn’t the relationship they want. We need to own what we do best,
musculoskeletal evaluation and treatment. The path to a sustained reality is
one of ownership and responsibility of the “direct access mindset”. It’s not
acute care, neuro and outpatient, it’s “neuromusculoskeletal care”, and
physical therapists are the best at prescribing it.
